"Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I think one difference between the EOS-3 and MZ-S that should be considered >is the external build quality. The MZ-S is quite solid as far as newer >cameras go and the EOS-3 feels like plastic junk, I have shot both of these >cameras and there is no comparison. > >Actual the Elan7e (EOS30) felt better than the EOS-3 > >Also the focusing screen on the MZ-S kicks ass on the focusing screen in any >Canon EOS body i've used. > >That doesnt mean that the MZ-S is a better camera though, I think they both >have there strengths.
I think the MZ-S is very inexpensive for its construction quality and capabilities. Lists of specifications are no way to choose a camera. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
