On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Keith Whaley wrote: > No, it's convenience VS. better results. Not MORE convenience. > Well, I guess there might really be no distinction there, come to > think of it...
Nope, there's distinction there, and you've stated which way you feel you want to go.. You see no more convienece in teh tiny S. > The Optio 550 is still pocketable, however. > Yes,. it's bulkier than the S, indeed, but much more capable. I forgot to mention earlier that one of my big things is tht something that's small to someone is STILL too big for me..like Palm Pilots. I bought a Palm 3 over a Palm 5 when they were both the hot thing, I rarely carried the 3 after the novelty wore off because even those it was small and light, it was still too big to easily fit into a shirt pocket and not hang way down. A 5 probably owuld've fit right in there, and would've been my better choice. Now, sure the 3 had many advantages in pure specs on the 5, however, I wouldn't gladly traded the extra memory and AAA batteries for something I'd actually carry. > Hah, hah... Thanks for your words! I do appreciate all argument, to > help solidify my intentions. > You've helped. Hey, as long as I get to freely rant... ;) -- http://www.infotainment.org <-> more fun than a poke in your eye. http://www.eighteenpercent.com <-> photography and portfolio.
