I thought there wasn't much difference once you get to 300mm or so. I thought the K300/4 and the 6x7 300/4 were the same lens except for the mount. Now considering the price of a 300/2.8 the adapter is really cheap.
Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:34 PM Subject: RE: 67 lens -> screw mount adapter? > why would you want to use the huge, oversized > 67 lenses on a 35mm body? ( I know I own > a bunch of them). If your going to put up > with the bulk and weight and carry > the 67 lenses, might as well bring a 67 body > along too. > JCO > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ryan K. Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:18 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 67 lens -> screw mount adapter? > > > > > > Correction- I meant to say the EOS version is over $300. I'm trying to > > get 67 lenses on my 1Ds. > > > > J. C. O'Connell wrote: > > > > >yes it exists, but WHY??? > > >JCO > > > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > > >>From: Ryan K. Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 1:01 AM > > >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >>Subject: 67 lens -> screw mount adapter? > > >> > > >> > > >>I know there's an adapter to go from 67 -> K-mount, but is there one > > >>that goes to screw mount? Google didn't turn up any. > > >> > > >>TIA, > > >> > > >>Ryan > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
