> Are you under the impression that the film, in > its cassette, might have been fogged by subdued light in the bathroom?
I was,but i developed in class last night with some technidol he had.One pack to 8 oz of water. I rated it at 50(apparently it can be rated from 6 to 200) which agording to the Kodak site is ok.I developed for 5 min. and all turned out well.Did a test print.Boy,impressive.Not much grain and lots of detail. > You write 'The info on Kodak's website suggests to load and unload in > complete darkness.' This doesn't make any sense either. Yhe web info on the Kodak site said it needs to be loaded unloaded un complete darkness,which i did not do,but it seems to have had no effect loading (quickly)in subdued light. Thanks all for the tips. Dave > Don > > _______________ > Dr E D F Williams > http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams > Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery > Updated: March 30, 2002 > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 8:08 PM > Subject: Technical Pan OT > > > > > > Hi all. > > My darkroom instructor suggested i try a roll of TP.A lot of my B&W stuff > is rural,old > > farms etc and he > > suggested it would be a good film to try as it can be shot at a low speed > and obtain good > > clear prints. > > I shot one about 2.5 weeks ago,but like any good male,i read the > instructions AFTER i > > loaded it.The info > > on Kodaks website suggests to load and unload in complete darkness.I > unfortunalte loaded > > it in > > subdued light in my bathroom. > > Am i s***ed here or will this little amount of light not effect much.I > wondered about it > > as the package is > > translucent,not solid like the HIE films. > > > > Any thoughts or comments before i possible waste some developing time. > > BTW it's rated it at 50 with just a standard uv filter for the test. > > > > Dave(2 classes to go,boo hoo)Brooks > > > > > >
