to a couple thousand. Even if you delete all the photo's on a card change cards
change batteries or leave them out entirely for a few hours the camera remembers
where it left off.
At 11:13 AM 3/31/2003 -0800, you wrote:
The only word that come to mind is, "Really?!"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Keith Whaley posted: > > > > Herb Chong wrote: > > > > > > if you have a large collection of images for it to manage, > > > it can get pretty slow. by large, i mean 6-7000 images. > > > > Who among us _ever_ has 6000 images to manipulate? > > I wouldn't have that many over a lifetime!
Granted, that was a small exaggeration...
> Bought my (non-Pentax) digital camera in June 2001, and am now up to somewhere
> between image# 8000 and 8100. If it HAD been a Pentax I might have shot even
> more, as sometimes I choose a (Pentax) film camera over the digital just 'cause
> I want to have the possibility of a PUG entry out of the shoot.
And you'd do that because is was Pentax, instead of it was 'film,' right? IOW, you'd submit an entry to PUG that was digital, no problem. Right?
> > Admittedly I haven't kept all the images, of course, but I have > archived most of them.
How one keeps track is still a small puzzlement, to me...!
keith whaley Who needs to get out more, and the only way to do that is to get rid of some of the myriad OTHER interests I have! I simply can not do all of them! And in the end, it's my photography that suffers...
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx
