Hello ...

I have both and much prefer the 803, but the real question is what 
bameras and lenses you wish to carry.  The smaller pentaxes (ME S, MX, 
and some of the newer ones) are fine, and depending on which lenses I 
am using I can carry as many as three bodies and four or five lenses. 
Big lenses it's not so good for so many, but depends on how you load 
them.  

LX is a problem.  Only two, or one, depending on lenses.

The pockets make easy to carry many rolls of film, filters, brushes, 
notebooks, accessories of all kinds.  You must learn to pack carefully 
however.  I make a way to carry two lenses in place where only one 
would fit, taking idea from special Leica lens cap.

In the bag now is MX with 85mm lens, MX with 18mm lens, digital 
camera, case for 8 memory cards, extra battery, several lens hoods, 
notebook, pen, hand meter, and five rolls film, three filters, and an 
extra

 
Leica piece I never remove, plus tiny little tripod.

803 is wonderful bag.  If you carry many more gears, get two, wear 
them both, balance your load.  It will be perfect, and you have room 
for lunch as well.

Z


>    would like to get the satchel, either 802 or 803 for now (as I
>    can't use the F2/F3 any longer). I remember there are few members
>    with the 802 and 803 (Shel, I think, and others <g>).
> 
>    Any advice on which one of them, please?
> 
>    802 is bigger, it's deeper. I am not sure I like it being deeper.
 
>    Curiously, it's the less expensive of the two (locally).
> 
>    803 is more expensive (why? Does it have padding the 802 doesn't?
>    The sides are padded? Insert is included?), but also smaller (and
>    maybe better for it).
> 
>    I want to carry cameras, notebooks, normal things, photographs,
>    etc... So it would be a nice

 
universal bag with quick access to
>    cameras.




--
Prendi GRATIS l'email universale che... risparmia: http://www.email.it/f

Sponsor:
Il nostro catalogo completo a casa tua, gratis! Vieni da Peraga, tanti prodotti 
introvabili per te.
Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=450&d=1-4

Reply via email to