I have tried the 28 3.5 M, and owned a 28 2.8 M, the first was nice the second OK, but I really like the 28 2 A. In addition to good performance I like the shallow DOF. Here�s an example (sorry about the Norwegian language):
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=13611


...and a different example:
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=22010

DagT


P� onsdag, 2. april 2003, kl. 09:44, skrev adphoto:


out of the following
28mm 3.5 k
28mm 3.5 m
28mm 2.8 k
28mm 2.8 m
28mm 2.8 A
28mm 2.8 f
28mm 2.8 fa
28mm f2 k
28mm f2 m
28mm f2 A
30mm 2.8 m





Reply via email to