> What about the image quality of the M-20/4, Bob? I remember some quotations > on Stan's site were not so favourable regarding this lense.
I have never had notable problems or reason to be unhappy over image quality, but I've never run any side by side tests. I've been using an A20/2.8 lately and think it is a bit better performer but I can't see much difference between the M-20/4 and K-20/4. This surely isn't a copy of Bill C's 20mm Bow-Wow Takumar, nor even a close relative! Regards, Bob S.
