On June 5, 2003 07:44 am, Herb Chong wrote:
> oops, i meant filtering and interpolating.
>
> Herb...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 07:33
> Subject: Re: OT: 2 articles from the washington post
>
> > it doesn't interpolate. you can tell when you take pictures of things
> > that would be improved by a small amount of interpolation. i have some
> > test images done up as photographic prints and there are a few places
> > where these artifacts are visible. if they interpolated, they would not
> > be.
>
If it doesn't interpolate then what does it do? Do the pixels cover the whole
sensor? That link claimed the pixels are on a 9 micron centre spacing. That
would be a big sensor with a lot of false data. If they've got gaps then
you're using swiss cheese. Aren't those the only choices? Interpolate,cover
the whole sensor or ignore the gaps?
Nick
