I suspect we'll have as many different rankings as pdml members. Here's mine:

1. 90 macro - it allows me to forget about hitting lens closest focus distance; nice for portraits, city shots, macros and whatnot.
2. 50 - the most pleasurable lens to use; small, light, fast, sharp, low distortion, convenient field of view. what else could you dream of ?
3. 135 - more compression and background separation than 90. Great for outdoor portraits. tend to use the 90 instead because of closer min focus distance.
4. 200 - even more compression and background sep than the 135. More difficult to handle too. Great portrait lens if you have enough space.
5. 28 - way too many things in the frame. nearly unused.



Mike Ignatiev wrote:
Ranked by frequency of use it's:
1. 50mm/1.7 -- all-purpose, light and fast
2. 16mm/2.8 fisheye -- *really* wide (think a cathedral top to bottom from across the 
street). besides, i do like the distortion
3. 24mm/2.8 -- just wide and very rectangular
4. 135mm/3.5 -- portraits and whenever i want to compress perspective.
This is my walkaround kit, together with Bogen table tripod.
The rest (35mm, 85mm, 105 macro and 200mm) is used very infrequently.

best,
Mishka






Reply via email to