----- Original Message -----
From: "Caveman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: K-mount compatibility (was Re: *ist D revisited)


> While you guys are having fun with it... let me add that dropping
> backward compatibility in K-mount � la Nikon means that from this moment
> on, Pentax will be competing with C/N/M based on strictly their FA lens
> lineup quality, features, pricing and completeness.

Yes, and it seems that Pentax has just thrown the gauntlet before C/N/M. OK,
so be it. If it means there will be the MZ-5n/3 successor, IS/USM, more
FA*'s, Limiteds and FA lenses of the built quality *at least* matching the
FA 24-90, then I can live with that and most probably accept and enjoy. I'm
not going to get rid of my Super A, so my plain K-mount lenses will not
collect dust. If the compatibility with KA-lenses is maintained then it will
still be more than the competition offers. But if Pentax fails to provide
the current and potential costomers with sufficient excuses for abandoning
the K-mount compatibility then...
Regards
Artur

Reply via email to