Yes, with regard to the focal length I agree. What I'm curious about is the optical quality. If I understand it correctly the Super Takumar does not have SMC. Is that such a drawback that it rules this lens out? And besides the lack of SMC what are the optical quality of the lens compared to i.e. the 100/2,8?
regards, Petter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Friday, June 13, 2003 11:04 am Subject: Re: Super Takumar 85/1,9 vs SMC M100/2,8 > Think I would choose 85 for slightly shorter working distance, > especially > indoor. > > regards, > Alan Chan > > >Which one would you use for wedding photografies? > > _________________________________________________________________ > Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail >
