Anthony Farr wrote: > > Is it possible that PDML itself bears some of the blame for Pentax's shift > to body controlled aperture. After being pilloried for dropping the feature > on the MZ-S, it returns with increased emphasis on later cameras. So what > happens? They get pilloried again! > > Bet they wish they were Asahi Brewing instead of Asahi Optical. The > brewery's customers are bound to be a more cheerful lot.
Certainly the louder of the two! keith <g> > > regards, > Anthony Farr > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > It works from the body, just like the PZ-1p. Remember, most people here > > complained about the MZ-S not having aperture available from the body. > Now > > the complaint is they want to use the aperture ring instead of the body. > > > > Go Figure! > > > > Bill > >
