MZ-S is a bit overpriced but it has all the features I need and more. Great camera, all who have tested it have liked it. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Artur Ledóchowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Päivä: 18. kesäkuuta 2003 11:26 Aihe: Re: Re: Lens Mount Progress >Użytkownik fastpat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał: >>Robert, if you think the MZ-S is overpriced, compare it to similarly-priced >>cameras in terms of build quality, as well as features. It\'s built to a >>noticeably higher standard than any other 35mm in the present Pentax line. >>I have to agree with another list member (I\'ve forgotten his name) who found >>no desire at all to use his MZ-5n, now that he has an MZ-S. The difference >>in feel and quality is that obvious. > >Yes, but even if the MZ-S is well built, is't not built well ENOUGH to justify the >high price - it isn't sealed. So if one doesn't use the camera as a hammer, can >easily go for a regular plastic body - it'll surely survive to the next moment of >getting a new one. > >>As for features, it has all most people need. More features does not always >>mean more <useful> features. When shooting beside someone with a D100, see >>how they envy the better low-light AF of the MZ-S, just for starters. > >But more features for the same or less money is more fair than less features for more >money, don't you think? MZ-S is a great camera but could have been a better one if it >was cheaper or have some more features (vide: Dynax 7) >Regards >Artur >
