What? Shoot some film? That's heresy on this list! Bill
----- Original Message ----- From: "Len Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 7:30 PM Subject: RE: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn�t good? > Part of the reason is because there are only a few people here that > actually have one, so most people here have no real first-hand knowledge > of it. Most of the opinions here are based on reading what other people > say about it and then carrying that lack of knowledge to extremes. I > recommend finding a camera store that will allow you to test it > yourself. Bring a roll of film with you, load it up, and then put the > camera through some tough tests to see how it performs. > > Len > --- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jose Luis Gonzalez Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:12 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Why Pentax *ist (35mm) isn�t good? > > > > > > I�m new in the forum, and it seems that the new Pentax *ist > > (35mm) is not a favourite among forum members. Can anybody > > explain me in a few words why? In other words, may I buy that > > camera, or the Nikon 75 or even the veteran Canon EOS 300 are > > better choices? I never had a AF camera (I own a Pentax P30t) > > so tell me your opinions about the best choice among the > > three mentioned bodies. > > > > Thanks > > > >
