On 19 Jun 2003 at 17:43, Alin Flaider wrote: > > whickersworld wrote: > > Obviously the shrink advised you to vent your frustration upon pdml > as the cheap alternative to having to get the F100 and afferent > lenses. > ;o) > Now seriously, of your long list you can retain the points related > to speed (AF, shutter, etc.) However, these are not paramount for a > lot of people who prefer a more deliberate approach to photography, > and for whom the MZ-S is close to perfect. > And btw, I have yet to hear of the MZ-S poor build quality, low > shutter life, high vibration or poor multisegment metering with or > without the flash.
The Leica/Voigt lenses which were mentioned earlier by John fit neither an F100 or MZ-S and obviously aren't AF or Auto anything, makes me wonder :-) Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
