Hi Alan,

> I have the 'F' which looks identical to the FB. As far as I know, they are
> identical (but can't be since they have different names?).

--Thats what is says on Boz's site, but I can't tell either

> It fits any bodies since the M series. I don't think it will fit K or
> earlier series, just like Refconverter M/A. It covers more than the splite
> image & microprisms, but I cannot provide any figure. However, I have
found
> the magnification of the Refconverter A seems to provide clearer and
> slightly higher magnification at 2X setting.

--The eyepiece cover of my MZS fits perfectly on my K1000. The only contact
it needs to make to work is to able to slide down the rails. Yes/No/Maybe?
>
> >2] Can you use it in portrait format, using your right eye, the pictures
> >dont really show you how far back it bends?
>
> Why not?

--Well I downloaded the manual for the magnifier F (Theres no FB on the US
site) and it shows how far the tube bends back, dosn't it get in the way
when you turn the camera into portrait mode?
>
> >3] Is it of metal construction or a cheap and nasty plastic thingy?
>
> Plastic and rubber body, coated glasses. But the whole thing don't feel
> cheap. You can even flip it up (but might get in the way depends on the
> bodies. I can flip it up completely with MX, but not Z-1p. Perhaps the FB
> fixed this problem? If you want metal, looks for the M, but I have seen it
> once only on eBay, and it wasn't cheap (even rarer than Refconverter A).

--I would prefer metal, I'm rather strange that way, the more delicate an
item, the more likely I'm to break it. I've seen one refconverter at $400- I
rather buy a limited lens for that kind of money.

Thanks,

Feroze

Reply via email to