Caveman wrote: There's no meter with 100% accuracy. If you didn't know that, you're entitled to ask for a refund for your physics courses. It might allow for buying a new lens or something.
REPLY: As usual this is one of your anal retentive (did anyone use the word measurbator?), wild goose chase arguments. Of course nothing is 100%. It may be 99%. A 100% meter is a meter that give the same result consistently from time to time. We are talking about precision levels that are way within what is visible on film. In other words, what is relevant. Not your irrelevant goose chase of what constitutes 100%. A meter that gives the same result everytime is common language 100%, dead on...whatever. Oh... and shutters are also usually 100% these days but I'm sure you'll let us all know that they are probably only 99,99% and thereby try to set the discussion in a totally irrelevant direction about some quarrel of semantics. The last shutter test I saw they had error margin of 1%. Still, the errors were smaller. Hence, it was claimed to be 100%. But I guess their physics courses sucked. P�l
