----- Original Message ----- From: "P�l Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Vs: Vs: Lens Mount Progress
> It is you who don't get the point that built quality costs and for many it is worth paying for. I can fully understand that not all want to pay extra for built quality but rather have many features cheap. Thats OK. However, not everyone want a plasticky camera loaded with features. MZ-S has the metal housing but still isn't sealed. This means it is not much better than an average plastic camera like the MZ-5n unless of course one uses it for hammering nails. Yet it's not much cheaper from the, say, F100. > Not true at all! You claim that the MZ-S is overpriced as if it was a fact, when in reality you simply means that you don't want to pay that kind of money for that camera. Thats OK. However, you won't find any better built and better specified 35mm slr cheaper than the MZ-S. It is the cheapest metal bodied 35mm slr on the market. That hardly qualifies as overpriced. This doesn't necessarily constitutes a comercial success. It may be made of whatever you can imagine - if the price is not competitive, nobody will buy it except for a few hobbyists. Regards Artur
