My silly thought is that once you are going to put the camera on a tripod you might just as well go to large format and be done with it.
Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:07 AM Subject: Re: 67 or 645?? > > I do alot of landscape photography and have > been selling so work lately. it > > was suggested to me that for larger prints A3 and above medium format is the > > way to go. > > > > this is what i have come to > > 645 pros - AF, wider angle of view (most of my 35mm shots are between 15 - > > 30mm most at 20mm), more economical with film > > > > 67 cheaper body and lenses, better landscape format, larger film size. > > > > how easy is it to shoot the 67 in portrait mode? > > > > any one use either or both? > > > > suggestions on which format is better,? > > Finallty there is talk that the canon 1Ds is as good as medium format. > > Should I weight for a pentax equivalent? or is pentx relaesing a Digital > > medium format camera? > > I went through the same thoughts too and i decided on the 6x7.I have only had the > camera a short while but i have had no problems todate shooting the 6x7 in portrait > mode,however only a few shots so far.I use my elbows and beer gut to prop > up the camera..lol > Good luck in your decision,either way i think you will be happy. > > As far a digital,well i have thoughs on it,but i want to do some 6x7 enlargements > prior to commenting on this just yet. > > Dave > > > >
