"Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 26 Jun 2003 at 7:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> The charts are all the more impressive, because of the higher than usual >> frequencies used. Being a big 28-105 fan, the 14-54 (28-108) is very attractive. >> I wouldn't fixate on pixel count. There are a number of parameters that >> determine image quality. Pixel count is only thing. It could produce images >> equal to, or even better than another 6mp DSLR. > >Higher spatial frequencies usually produce worse graphs. I don't understand why >they have used non-standard 20/60 LPMM test frequencies as it makes comparisons >to other system difficult. What is interesting however is that even at 20LPMM >the graphs show lower than average contrast for the Macro lens at least is is >however very consistent across the image circle and shows very low geometric >distortion. I wouldn't say that the MTFs are overall impressive though.
Especially as the small physical size of the sensor means you have to enlarge the image much more and get a print with much lower final resolution. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
