In Boz' wonderful page he explains the difficulties
with using Adaptall mount lens with the KA adapter. I
don't quite understand what he is saying. I have a
bunch of Tamron lens that I want to use on my new *ist
D (in the future of course) but don't understand what
limitations they will have.  I have a 17/3.5,
35-105/2.8, 80-200/2.8, 90/2.5, 180/2.5, 350/5.6, 
400/4, and 500/8. What are the practical limitations
on use of my Tamrons? I looked back in the archives a
couple of years but came up with only the info below. 
Please help.

Warren

<<<http://us.f144.mail.yahoo.com/ym/ShowLetter?YY=13073&order=up&sort=date&pos=1

The Tamron KA Adaptall Mount

When Joachim Hein read the above discussion, he
immediately understood the roots of the exposure
problems that some Adaptall lenses have. These are all
"slow" lenses with minimum aperture setting of f/22
and an "AE" setting or f/32 and no "AE" setting In the
latter case, f/32 is converted to "AE"). "AE" is the
Tamron equivalent of the Pentax "A" setting. Looking
in the second column of the table above, we see that
there is no contact pattern for lenses with apertures
ranging between f/4.5 or slower and f/22. Tamron
solves this by making the Adaptall mount indicate a
maximum aperture of f/4 and warning in the mount
manual that the photographer must watch the aperture
read-out in the view-finder (not available with
P30/P50!) to ensure that only values within the true
aperture range are used.>>>


=====
Warren Xato

For where to go when you know when
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Reply via email to