Tom, I use this kind of "logic" to justify shooting nothing newer
than a SuperProgram, but yesterday I fooled around with my wife's
ZX-L and experienced a tad of envy.  Some of the touches on the
newer cameras, even one as basic as the -L, are really nice.

I believe they can help capture the instinctive "grab" shots that
tend to pass me by.

T Rittenhouse wrote:
Well, first off, Bill, most of the cameras us "old farts" like are almost as
old as the kids who are complaining about us using them. If the new auto
everything wonder cameras they insist is the only thing that works actually
took better quality photographs, there might me something to their argument,
but in fact they do not, and in many cases they do not do as well as the
older cameras mostly due to the need to make things light enough not to
overload the focusing motors.

The fact that most of the whippersnappers can not believe that you can make
photos of action, or do flash without TTL, much less using guide numbers,
shows that their cameras are better photographers than they are. As you well
know, all you need are  aperture, shutter speed, and focus controls and a
little knowledge. However, on many current cameras you are not a
photographer you are a camera programmer. Yes on the better cameras you can
override everything but since it is designed not for human interface but for
computer interface, that is never as satisfactory as a camera designed for
human interface.

Simply put, most of the improvements in each new generation of cameras is
better interface with, and more capability for, the built in autopilot. If
you prefer to drive it yourself the new cameras really offer no improvement.
Unlike the automobiles you mention which tend to be faster, safer, and more
comfortable than 20 year old ones. In fact, cameras are in some ways more
like airplanes than cars as there are still a lot of 20, 30, or 50 year old
ones still in service.

Anyway, it is hard for a 22 year old computer programmer to figure why
anyone would use a camera that is older than he is other than cheapness.




Reply via email to