Naw, it is just another of his snipes at me. Don't pay him no mind, no one
else does.

Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto


----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Bevers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: Digital Delays?


>
> On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 12:21 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > There are folks on this list whose first hand experience with new
> > technology stopped with flash bulbs. All they know about is some
> > mathematical model, and they don't know if it's any good, or if it
> > makes any sense.
> > If they really knew anything, they'd be making more noise about what
> > is lost on the 16 > 8 bit conversions, and not because someone does
> > one, high quality save to JPG.
> >
> > BR
> >
> >
>
> Bruce - I certainly hope this comment doesn't refer to my discussion of
> JPEG compression.  I may not have a DSLR, but I've been working with
> TIFFs and JPEGs for half my life.  On the other hand, I've only begun
> to understand film and exposure over the last 18 months.  Frankly,
> since I'm only 24 years old, my understanding of technology couldn't
> have even started with flashbulbs, let alone stopped there.  The
> running discussion was about JPEG compression, so I didn't bring up the
> problem of 16 -> 8 bit conversions because it wasn't what we were
> talking about, not because of a lack of knowledge.
>
> I know it won't make a difference to say so, but it really is quite
> frustrating to attempt to contribute to this list only to have you tell
> everyone that they don't know what they're doing because they: aren't a
> working photographer / don't have a DSLR / use a camera brand that
> doesn't make a top-flight 35mm SLR / aren't as perfect and all-knowing
> as you.  Believe it or not, some of us do base our comments on actual
> experience and knowledge, we don't just spout stuff we read on the
> internet somewhere.
>
> -Matt
>


Reply via email to