Around midsummer last year there was a thread called "your boat"
that might rival the record.
(which of course can't stay forever, or what? :-))

Cheere:s
Jostein

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:01:55 -0700

>Very well said Bill! It is sad.
>Never seen four "Re"`s before, is that a record?
>
>Steve Larson
>Redondo Beach, California
>
>
>William Robb wrote:
>> Agreed, in fact I don't think there is a better camera system 
for learning
>> the craft of photography. The lenses are mostly very good to 
superb, and
>> since that is the only thing between the film and subject at 
the moment of
>> exposure, for me, it is the most important component in the 
picture taking
>> process.
>> The problem though is that as they phase out compatability with 
older
>> equipment, they are limiting the craft oriented photographer.
>> It looks like you already can't use a bellows on the new 
cameras, as it
>has
>> physical restrictions because of the prism extending over the 
mount.
>> Suddenly, the person interested in the craft of macro 
photography is
>> limited.
>> Remove K-mount compatability, and suddenly the craft oriented 
photographer
>> has more options removed.
>> Some of the older lenses are still of world class quality, 
capable of
>> producing excellent images.
>> Some lenses, such as the M50mm f/1.4 or M85mm f/2 do not have 
replacements
>> that offer similar imaging qualities. If you value the look of 
the images
>> coming from these lenses, you are out of luck.
>>
>> Pentax is a craft oriented brand. The 35mm bodies are designed 
more for
>the
>> leisure photographer than the working professional.
>> Craft oriented people don't replace equiment on a whim, and 
don't like to
>> have tools that have served them well for decades made 
redundant.
>>
>> This is now the Pentax paradox.
>> They are in the business of supplying the craft photographer, 
but they
>also
>> seem to be in the process of alienating that very market.
>> This, I find completely mystifying.
>>
>> William Robb
>>
>
>
.

Reply via email to