Paul Ewins wrote: > > 1. The *ist-D is the digital equivalent of the MX. > The Australian Distributor of Pentax (http://www.crkennedy.com.au ) lists > four major features of the *ist-D, and one of them is "The world's > smallest, lightest body" which was one of the major features of the MX & ME. > The MX was no match for the Nikon F2/F3 series in terms of features, but it > was the best combination of features vs. size. > The MX wasn't a pro body and neither is the *ist-D,
Whoah! Paul, stop there! The MX was made to withstand very high rates of frames/second when used with a motor drive. It also had a particularly robust, reliable and long-lasting shutter. Those are the reasons I bought one - my gear gets very hard use. Given its features and construction, I find it very difficult to regard the MX as anything other than a pro camera. Regards, John
