Ah, the real Dr. Williams appears, sheds his thin veneer of civility and shows his true, base inner self...
Thank you Sir. keith whaley Dr E D F Williams wrote: > > I was going to simply ignore your ever so predicable crap, but for the > group's benefit I thought I'd better reply in public. > > You're as thick as two planks Whaley. And you just can't leave things alone. > I asked you twice to leave it, but you simply have to behave like the > fucking trolling twat you are! You're always giving other people lessons. I > was quoting literature sources probably before you were born. If you are so > fucking stupid that you couldn't work out why I left the sender's name out, > then at least you could be silent. Perhaps even think for once. But no, you > have to open your big ignorant mouth don't you? Don't waste your time > mailing me off list either. I pity your poor wife -- if you have one. > > DW > _______________ > Dr E D F Williams > http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams > Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery > Updated: March 30, 2002 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:55 PM > Subject: Re: 2 LXs, MDs, Lenses, etc. on ebay- Wow. > > > > > > > Dr E D F Williams wrote: > > > > > > I knew exactly what I was doing when I put posted that message. > > > > You mean you deliberately _planned_ to just let that quote go > unattributed? > > > > > If you worked out where it came from why imply > > > that others on this list would not be able to do > > > the same? > > > > I implied nothing. I had personally written the seller, and he sent me > > back the same exact message, but when he did, it was person to person, > > not a general list message like you posted. > > I "worked out" what you posted because he sent the very same message to > > me. Rather easy mental segue, even for me.... > > There are, at any given time, some 5 to 8 different subjects being > > actively discussed on this list. > > I prefer to cut down the ambiguity in correspondence, by making my > > messages as clear as I can. > > I suggest to others that they might be better correspondents by doing > > the same. What's wrong with that? > > > > You just don't like for any criticism of you, however small or > > insignificant, to be addressed in public. I'll do it privately from now > > on. I hereby apologize publically, for addressing you publically. > > > > > Don't start! > > > > Got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning, Don? > > > > > Don > > > > > > PS: Don't start! > > > > Now you're repeating yourself! Don't be a twit... > > > > keith > >
