Hans Imglueck wrote: > > Saddam has had not the power to do what Hitler has done. In his > case a war was not necessary. Hitler forced the war and I do think > that self defence is the right of each human being. Saddam > has not started the fire.
Time to do some research and reading, Hans... Look carefully at all the atrocities committed by Saddam, and see if you can say what you just said with a straight face. Interview the Iraqi people and see how they fared under his oppressive regime. Pay attention to all the graves of the Kurds, and others he disliked. MASS graves, mind you. Saddam's "fire" burned his own people as well of those of many other ethnic groups. Literally tens of thousands of people are now dead, as a direct result of Saddam's actions. And, also keep in mind this has occurred over tens of years, not a few months. He has a long, well-documented history of abuse and cruelty and decimation of his own people. How can that NOT be considered? He was a very dangerous despot, and eventually everybody will be better off with him out of power. keith whaley > The wounds of WWII were not > healed by removing Hitler - of course it was necessary to do this first - but > by the friendship between American, French, British, German and all > the others. > > Best regards, Hans. > > --- Dan Matyola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Chamberlain tried that with Hitler. IIRC, it didn't work too well. > > > >Hans Imglueck wrote: > > > >>Evil can only be overcome with love and peace. > >> > > _____________________________________________________________ > 23a mail > > _____________________________________________________________ > Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get [EMAIL PROTECTED], No Ads, 6MB, > IMAP, POP, SMTP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag
