In which way is the 4/28-70 "essentially" same as 2.8/28-70. And which kind of macro feature the former has? Mine did not have any IIRC. The 4.0/28-70 is one very good lens. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-----Alkuper�inen viesti----- L�hett�j�: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P�iv�: 19. hein�kuuta 2003 19:36 Aihe: Re: FA 28-70 f2.8 >That's possible. >I have a FA 28-70mm f/4.0 AL on the way to me (haven't seen it yet) and >it's presumably got some small (I hope) glitch in it's 'macro' feature. >Odd that it's essentially the same lens. >I'll be wringing it out as soon as I get it. >I'll report back... > >I was sort of wishing it had been an f/2.8 instead, but perhaps it won't >matter. We'll see. > >keith whaley > >Joseph Tainter wrote: > >> P�l reported here that he has had problems of build quality/mechanical >> failure with this lens. Has anyone else had such problems? (P�l has also >> acknowledged, if I recall correctly, that he is hard on equipment.) >> >> Thanks, >> >> Joe >
