on 23.07.03 19:38, Lon Williamson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > As an additional note: The ZX-L supports wireless, too. I don't > know that it supports as many flash options as the MZ-S, but it has > more flash options than any other Z body. Anyone know if the *ist > is as capable with flash as the -S and -L? > *ist besides normal x-sync speed (1/125 s vs. 1/180), has exactly the same flash capabilities as MZ-S. It is slightly better than ZX-L (MZ-6) because it can invoke modelling flash (even with many wireless flashes) wirelles - it was impossible with ZX-L.
-- Best Regards Sylwek
