I took lots of sharp ones that day. Maybe it was because that one wasn't sharp that I looked twice at it! At the risk of sounding elitist (hell, I ~am~ elitist), I don't think the photo.net folks were bashers, I just don't think they "got it". He he he.
Thanks Brendan! -frank Brendan wrote: > not evey photo needs to be tack sharp, I've seen many > ads in mags that look like this shot so my vote would > be ignore those photonet bashers > -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
