I think I need to clarify myself here.
Epson 2400 can give me roughly 8MP from purely optical scan. I've seen
the results and they are quite impressive. It can also do very good
scans from proper b/w film, such as Kodak TMax 100. I wonder whether
such scanner is enough for a semi-serious amateur like me, or do I
have to buy Epson 3200. This one has roughly twice the resolution, and
is said to have proper dynamic range. But $450 is a lot of money for
me and I don't see immediate good that would come out from choosing
3200 above 2400...
Any advise will be greatly appreciated.
Boris
- OT: Having to buy a scanner Boris Liberman
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Bob Walkden
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Boris Liberman
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Boris Liberman
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Sylwester Pietrzyk
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Boris Liberman
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner T Rittenhouse
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Boris Liberman
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Sylwester Pietrzyk
- Re: OT: Having to buy a scanner Paul Stenquist

