On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 13:13:55 +1000, Kevin Waterson wrote: >I have seen alot of debate here about Digital -v- Film >and why you should abandon Film in favour of digital, and >others why digital is a fad and it will soon go away. Others >have put forward very technical arguements why digital >is a replacement for film.
Digital will eventually win, but it won't be as quick as some people think. >Ya see, they way I look at it, it is not a replacement for >my MZ-S, or my P30n, or the 4 k1000s I have, it is another >tool, to be used in this case for PJ work. Currently I need This is right. It is another tool. It will augment my photographic tool box not replace what I have already. I have no plans of updating my MZ-S's to *ist's, nor do I plan on stoping using Kodachrome in the near future just because E-6 films are easier to process. I have plans for a digital camera. Some of them could be easily covered with a cheaper P&S digital but others can not, so the *ist D is on the shopping list for hopefully by the end of September or early October because some of my projects need to be done soon. >Kevin Waterson >Port Macquarie, Australia We will have to see if it is you, me or Jon is WA who gets the first *istD in Australia. Leon http://www.bluering.org.au http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
