Kristian Walsh wrote: > > For a start, you should use Photoshop -- QuickTime will interpolate > images at large magnifications.
Thanks for the info, but I don't have PhotoShop, and I DO have QuickTime. I also have GraphicConverter. How does that do? > Well, I just had a look at the Canon pic (their example #2), and... how > can I say this... did they not notice that the camera focussed well > forward of the model? (Look at the sharpness of her elbow compared with > her eyes) Maybe the stories about the 10D's AF are true ;-) I noticed that too. One of the shots, where she's facing to her right, got her eyes in perfect focus, with a shallow DOF. Nicely done in that shot. keith > Actually, why they used AF for a portrait shot is a mystery - the model > must have been *delighted* about how sharp the hairs on her arm came > out... > > On the actual topic - the two pics are too different to compare much: > I'll wait for the famous DPReview studio scene before I make any > decisions about image quality. > > -- > Kristian > > > I must say, after I downloaded both the .jpg and the .tiff images taken > > with the 10D, I am suitably impressed! > > I opened the images with Apple's "QuickTime Player" and the quality of > > the image is awesome! I blew up the image sizes to at least 3 or 4 > > times > > what actual life size would be, and the detail is most incredible! > > It simply doesn't wash out or pixelate as the image gets larger... > > That's with the 10D. Now I have to go look for the *ist-D images, but I > > know that's just going to be an exercise. > > This quite clearly shows the quality imagery available with digital > > today... > > > > keith whaley
