I didn't mean you, Peter. I specifically mentioned that in my post (the part where I said, "not today"). FWIW, I know you don't post that often, but I certainly recall seeing your name here in the past. Besides, you went out of your way to tell us that you're liquidating your 35mm to concentrate on your 645, and even if you're lying and are really buying a Canon DSLR system or something, at least you tried to keep us happy - you showed sensitivity to the list <vbg>.
But seriously, a couple of weeks ago, someone came on who I'd never heard of before, and tried dumping Pentax gear. That's who I was referring to, not you. I couldn't forget a name like Peter Popp! <vbg> cheers, frank Peter Popp wrote: > I'll weigh in on this thread, because it may have been my FS post (consciously or > subconsciously) that started it. While many of you may not be accustomed to seeing > my name show up on the list on a daily basis, I have been a subscriber to this list > for about 8 years, since it was run by the Pentax corporation itself. I usually > lurk, and comment on things only when I think I can make a real contribution. I > think the last time I made a post might have been when I informed the list about the > custom tripod collar I had made for my FA 300/4.5, and posted pictures of it on > photo.net. But I do read the list and find it (for the most part) both entertaining > and informative. > > I'm not meaning to take advantage of anybody with my prices. If you think I am, you > can either choose not to buy, or tell me they are too high by privately offering me > what you think they are worth. Either way, I'm quite sure you won't find gear in > this condition for the prices I am asking. If you do, tell me and I will reconsider > my prices. > > Peter -- "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
