Marnie said: "...considering how many pictures I take (not that many right now), I think I can hold off..."

I carried a small point and shoot film camera in my coat pocket or brief case for at least a couple of years. I bought the Optio S just a few months ago. I noticed this morning that, in that short time, I've take more images with the Optio than the film camera it replaced.

There's a couple of reasons for this.

The obvious one is the lack of incremental cost for film and processing. I just don't think about it.

The other is the immediate feedback on the LCD display. After reviewing a few shots, I get ideas for more. I'm still there at the site. So I immediately follow up on those ideas.

On a slightly different tack, I experienced another side effect of digital for the first time early this morning.

When I went to get the newspaper I noticed some mushrooms had sprouted in the yard. I took a few shots of the larger ones. After reading the paper and having a cup of coffee I dumped the images into my computer for a quick look. Though they had looked OK on the little LCD screen there was a little blur due to camera shake. I had held the camera in a very awkward position and evidently hadn't been very steady, so I went back out and successfully re-shot the images.

When I returned from my Saturday morning errands, the kid down the street had mowed the lawn, mushrooms and all. Had I used film, this would have been a lost opportunity. I would have dropped off the film during the morning's errands and picked it up until Monday after work.

Not really a big deal in this case. But it was an aspect of digital that hadn't "hit home" until today.

So, back to Marnie's words, I think I can hold off too. But, yesterday a DSLR was something I knew I would eventually buy as a supplement to my film camera. Today I'm fairly convinced that the film camera will be the a seldom used supplement.

See you later, gs









Reply via email to