Mark, Sorry I forgot the diatoms. They were at 900X on film - 90X Apo NA 1.3 oil immersion objective plus a 10X plan photo-eyepiece. The last one shows very fine lines of pores, but they are not visible on the screen; I should have made the picture bigger after cropping it a bit.
Don _______________ Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: July 31, 2003 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Cassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 5:44 PM Subject: Re: Nica and nasty pictures. > The microphotographs are excellent - what is the magnification on those? > > - MCC > > PS: I hope you get more relief than just a free pair of earplugs! > > At 04:55 PM 8/25/2003 +0300, Dr E D F Williams wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >I've posted some pictures if anyone would like to take a look. Diatoms, > >crystals, nasty machinery; including one of the arrival of a huge > >stone-crusher that's going to make our lives worse than Hell. There are a > >couple of electron micrographs not taken with a Pentax - sorry. All the > >others P30t on 'A' for every frame - Solaris 200 processed in Tetenal > >chemicals three months old. The camera works beautifully with the new > >photo-attachment I got from Loma in Chicago a few weeks ago. > > > >http://kotisivu.mtv3.fi/edfw/hold/index.htm > > > >Best, > > > >Don > > ----- > Mark Cassino > Kalamazoo, MI > ----- > > Photography: > > http://www.markcassino.com > > >
