P�l, didn't you say that the *ist-D was ugly when it first came out? Not unique enough (looks like a N80)?
If the *ist-D looked like the R8/9, you'd like it better... : ) --- Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P�l; > > Now I know why you don't think the ist-D is a nice > looking camera. You > obviously have much different tastes than a lot of > people I know. The Leica > R8 and R9 are two of the most beautifully designed > SLRs. The ist-D is an > average looking "modern" SLR; there is nothing > pretty about it or ugly about > it. It's "just a camera" whereas the R8 and R9 are > bold and interesting > (if not massive; not a good or bad point, just a > point) > > Christian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "P�l Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It doesn't surprise me that a Leica user find the > Limited lenses > appealing. They are obviously made for the (Pentax) > connoisseur and can > optically compete with anything. > > Even the *istD looks may appeal to a Leica users. > After all the *istD is > better looking than the Leica SLR's, arguably the > worst looking slr cameras > there is :-) > > > > > > P�l > > > > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
