incidentally, a proper deconvolution will not sharpen something that is already sharp. it should automatically affect only the areas not in focus. i am not sure if this is truly the case with FocusFixer, but it seems to affect already sharp areas less than an Unsharp Mask does. i have to do more testing.
Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Salikh Zakirov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "adphoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 8:35 AM Subject: Re: thanks herb for focusfixer -RESULTS INSIDE > Have you tried Unsharp mask with smaller radius (1.3-1.8)? > > I believe unsharp mask with small radius and high effect, > followed by slight softening (semi-transparent blurred layer) > would give result comparable to focus fixer.
