On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 9:52:02 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> [...] for small firms and home use it's OK. [...]

A critical caveat.  I agree.  For home use it's probably OK.

> The only problem we had was that our based was built in Access
> 2.0, but when Access 97 arrived it turneed out that M$ had left
> out some code that lost the backwards compatibility....

Building production systems for significantly more than home use, this
incompatibility stuff is a continual issue.

Everyone's experiences are different, but mine are along the lines of:

"If Access is the answer, you're asking the wrong question."

:-)


TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ


Reply via email to