Well said, Frank.

keith whaley

frank theriault wrote:
> 
> You're right, Sid,
> 
> What's not controversial about her is her skill and innovation as a filmaker.
> Beyond that, I don't know what to think.
> 
> She claimed never to have been a party member.  Claimed that in her later years
> at least, she didn't subscribe to Nazi politics or policy.  Claimed that she
> never (as was rumoured) had an affair with Hitler, and that she wasn't that
> close to him.  Claimed that her great works, including her personal triumph,
> "Triumph of the Will" was not propaganda, but merely (from her point of view) "a
> commission".
> 
> In her old age she said that she wished she'd never been born.
> 
> OTOH, she could have denounced the Nazi regime, but she didn't.  She could have
> apologized for (even unwittingly) making propaganda for one of the most evil
> regimes that this earth has ever seen, but she didn't.
> 
> She may not have been a party member, but evidence seems to point to the fact
> that as a young woman she was enamoured of the party, and it's policies, and
> seemed somewhat eager to become "an insider".  If that was true, she could have,
> after the fact, said that she was young, deluded, like many others in her
> country was fooled by the absolute and intoxicating power that the new party
> promised, and thereby blinded to the darker elements that we can now see were
> lurking just under the surface.  But she didn't.
> 
> It has been said that some propagandists of evil regimes, such as Eisenstein in
> the USSR, weren't vilified like her, and that their works were allowed to be
> seen as the art that they were, and not dismissed as propaganda.  It has been
> suggested that there was some sort of vendetta against Leni, who never did a
> film after WWII, as she could never get any sort of funding (and thus was
> effectively black-listed) - the reason that she could only produce works of
> still photography.
> 
> She was an enogma to be sure.  She was a great filmaker and photographer to be
> sure (her still photographs of the '36 Olympics are amazing).  I personally
> think that her personal politics were much more in line with Nazi-ism than she
> ever let on after the war.  Rightly or wrongly, that feeling colours my
> appreciation for her as an artist.
> 
> regards,
> frank
> 
> Sid Barras wrote:
> 
> > I thought it would be good to stir up some non-*istD controversy--
> >
> > And what better person to discuss infamy and fame about than Adolph Hitler's
> > own photographer and cinematographer?
> >
> > She could very well have been the most influential photographer of all time.
> >
> > Her use of camera angles in Triumph of the Will is a masterpiece. Had she
> > not gone into seclusion for so long after the fall of the Nazi regime, she
> > might have given us even more.
> >
> > Regardless, the Nubian pictures, her undersea photography (pursued well into
> > her 9th generation) gave us ample evidence this was not merely a Nazi
> > propagandist...
> >
> > Sid
> > (definitely not a Nazi sympathizer)
> 
> --
> Honour - that virtue of the unjust!
> -Albert Camus

Reply via email to