Simple.

Infinity is that distance beyond which one can focus with a Pentax.

keith 

"Otis C. Wright, Jr." wrote:
> 
> Awh.  There goes the weekend entertainment.  Sure  you don't want to
> tackle infinitiy?
> 
> Have a great weekend.
> 
> Otis
> 
> Keith Whaley wrote:
> 
> >Hi Otis!
> >
> >Hah, ha, ha! No he won't!
> >Those of you who were able to understand what I'm saying, already got my
> >point(s), agree with me or not, understand me or not.
> >Those who are still disagreeing and arguing with me about it - didn't.
> >
> >Anyhow, I'm pretty sure I know what THEY meant, and whether they know
> >what *I* was trying to say is sort of beside the point.
> >Perhaps I might have tweaked enough folks to actually start thinking
> >about what they read. To read words for sense, and not simply believe
> >something because it's what they've always heard, or what they've always read.
> >
> >       Think for yourself  Question what you don't understand.
> >               If you don't get the answers you want, ask again...
> >       Don't accept ambiguous, blurred and overly complicated
> >               writing and so-called "reasoning," if it doesn't make
> >               sense to you.
> >       This thread is a perfect example of defending muddled
> >               thinking and refusal to accept new ways of thinking
> >               about things. Ooops! I didn't mean "things." I meant
> >               concepts. <g>
> >
> >I'd be most happy to continue any further discussion of this topic OFF
> >line, but I think Otis has made a very good point...enough is enough.
> >I've already joggled the hide-bound thinking of those capable of
> >determining what I meant -- those who care enough to reason it thru for themselves.
> >But, this tree will take a while to bear any fruit.
> >That the seeds have been planted is enough for now.
> >
> >Off my box, standing down...  <g>
> >
> >keith 'appleseed' whaley
> >
> >* * * *
> >
> >"Otis C. Wright, Jr." wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Now  you've done it.   Keith will be at this for another week.
> >>
> >>Otis Wright
> >>
> >>Herb Chong wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>that's why it took so long for zero as a concept to appear and be accepted.
> >>>
> >>>Herb....

Reply via email to