No, William, You said it right. I read it wrong.
Thanks for your patience in explaining it to me again. <vbg> cheers, frank William Johnson wrote: > Hi Frank, > > Thanks for the kind comment. I kinda like her too <grin> > > Um.. that said I think I must have a communication problem. I said "I > rarely use a 50mm lens stopped down past about f/5.6" which I mean as I > rarely use smaller (physically) apertures like 8, 11, 16, and so forth. I > probably don't have the correct usage down to explain what I mean... what > else is new ;-) So yes, I almost always use it wide open or at least no > more than 3 stops from it. > > That said, I think the M50/1.4 is considerably better at f/2 than the M50/2 > is at f/2 (yeah I have a couple of those "optical body caps" too) so I think > you would be happy with the M50/1.4 FWIW, I prefer the M50/1.4 to the M or > A 50/1.7's also. I'd sure like a K50/1.2 to evaluate though! > > Thanks, > > William in Utah > -- "What a senseless waste of human life" -The Customer in Monty Python's Cheese Shop sketch
