----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: First use of ist D
> Thanks for the info Bill. Very kind of you. > > I think Pentax's iso 800 seems to have less noise than my D1 at 800. Were they shot > at relativly slow shutter speeds,the dog has motion blur were the box and person > look fine. > I see 4 pictures to kack a buffer a problem in some of myhorse work, but not > all of it. I usually "burst" 6-7 in a row when doing reining. I was shooting at full resolution too and largest jpeg size as well. I suspect I could cut that back to the next level down and get more images befor the buffer fills. I will try it later and report back. I recall the shutter speeds were a bit slow, but I NEVER record this stuff. I can't be filling my mind with useless junk. All I cared about was that AF was fast enough, and the shutter lag was more like my LX than anything else I have used. It's a pretty responsive camera. When you push the button, it takes the picture. It doesn't piss around about it. This is a good thing, since responsiveness is what small cameras are all about. They have to offer something to get us away from the big guns. William Robb
