I'm of the opinion you can't explain this to people. I didn't actually believe or understand it until I'd had a dslr for a month and had looked at a dozen or two 8x10's, 11x14's and 16x20's.
People just don't get it unless they see prints. tv > -----Original Message----- > From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 11:54 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: istD test needs doing..... > > > This was done years ago by people who take pictures, an not > of eye charts, > for a living. They now shoot with DSLRs and don't scan > film. The vast > majoriety of normal people don't examine photographs under > microscopes. At > normal viewing distances, for normal people, digital > pictures cna be made to > look better and sharper because of the lack of grain.. > > BR > > From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > What I would like to see is a (scanned) film > vs. digital output of the *istD using a really > good lens at a good fstop and really good > film like tmax 100 or fuji provia 100f. > > >
