I am not in favour of that at all. 

We also could have a separate list for the 645, and one for the 67, etc.
If we split it out as much as we can, we end up with three hundred lists
with only one member. OK, OK, that is obviously ridiculous, however I
wouldn't want this list to split up. Combining it all is giving this
list a lot of different areas of interest. And more options for flame
wars as well.


On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 21:28, Jim Apilado wrote:
> I notice on dpreview.com that some *istD users are taking a vote to get a
> separate forum for the "D" instead of lumping everything under Pentax.
> Perhaps all the *istD users here should go to the other site, or else a
> digital PDML list could be developed exclusively for the new camera.
> 
> Jim A.
> 
> > From: Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:24:27 +0200
> > To: Hans Beumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: I haven't got *Ist D
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:22:17 -0400
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Neither have I. But I also don't really want one. I am pretty much
> > happy with my ZX-L, several lenses, ME Super seemingly permanently in
> > repairs and one film a week that I try to shoot.
> > 
> > When *ist D would cost $500 it may be worth thinking of, at least for
> > me. Meanwhile I am going to enjoy reading reports of William Robb,
> > Leon Altoff and other "digital brothers". Hopefully I would learn a
> > thing or two since they are bound to be discussing some aspects of
> > technique that would be applicable to simple-filmed people, such as
> > you and me.
> > 
> > Don't hang your nose just yet (this is Russian saying, no offence
> > meant).
> > 
> > Boris (the one _happily_ without)
> > 
> > HB> I haven't got *Ist D. Haven't got the cash, or the nerves to tell my wife
> > I
> > HB> want one. And all PDML is talking about is *Ist D. Life sucks :-(
> > HB> Oh well, I'still have got my health...
> > 
> > HB> Hans B. (the one without...)
> > 
> > HB> mail to:
> > HB> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
-- 
Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to