I've chosen to comment on six. Last time around I tried to say how I would 
improve some photographs and I didn't feel it went that well, so this time I 
limit those comments. 
 
There Might Be a New Star by Matjaz Osojnik
 
This is my overall fav this month -- the aspirations of a child. In this case 
centering really works ;-), because the rails create a strong diagonal. In 
fact, the rails reaching upward seem to symbolize the kids wishes reaching 
upwards.  The circle effect of the people below with the shallow depth of field 
just reemphasize the boy and the way he stands (sits) apart them with his 
aspirations. I find it hard to verbalize the entire effect I think this composition 
has, but it is a very emotionally pleasing photograph that seems to "say 
something" -- to convey a concept.
 
Mid Day Break by Sridhar Gibikote
 
This is my fav this month as regards content. I had to look at it twice to 
distinguish the rider of the biker on top of the bike. For that reason I really 
enjoyed it, as it is not immediately apparent what the subject matter is. And 
instead of showing a professional at work, it shows a professional snoozing 
--a different take on the theme -- and snoozing in position that one would think 
is uncomfortable. Also, the road at the bottom is necessary to make it clear 
that that is a biker. Interesting subject matter; good composition.
 
Professional Hairdresser by Jos van der Hijden
 
This ran a close second for me to Break -- the incongruity of the barber 
doing the kid's hair amid a bunch of outdoor junk makes the picture. Also the fact 
that he and the clients all seem very intent on the results regardless of the 
surroundings. This is the very picture of a dedicated professional.
 
Herding Ducks by Amita Guha
 
 I found this amusing and, of course, a working dog *is* a professional! The 
originality in subject manner was refreshing. I feel it has a bit too much 
surrounding grass though -- maybe a crop or bigger glass in the first place or 
something like that. But this one is fun.
 
We Were Professionals by John Coyle
 
In contrast, this one "got to me" because of the subject matter -- 
photojournalists killed on the job. The composition works too, even with the statue 
centered ;-), because this is a solemn memorial and because of the people along 
the side. I gave this photograph a moment of silence.
 
Professional Hogs by Frank Theriault
 
Nice composition of some bikes, nothing wildly exciting subject matter-wise, 
but visually pleasing with strong colors and a diagonal leading the eye 
upward.  Though, naturally, I like frank's people shots better.
 
Overall reactions:
 
I, too, felt that many of the photographs were dark. Either when they were 
taken originally underexposed or not scanned well or something. There was no 
photograph that I couldn't really *see*, but it was just a bit surprising that so 
many were dark.
 
My other reactions were a bit more complex, so I will see if I can put them 
into words. Hmmm, in many cases people chose photographs they had sold to fit 
the professional theme. 
 
Now, I want to stop here and say some things in defense of my past 
photography teacher -- mainly that he WAS QUITE GOOD -- technically and 
compositionally, 
etc. And as for the emphasis on not centering, well, that is something not 
done very often in art work (drawing/painting) either. A novice artist is 
encouraged out of it. But, yes, I did have trouble with some of his standard, almost 
knee-jerk, criticisms, like the centering thing and that an animal must show 
one eye, etc. I am trying to deprogram myself somewhat from his standards, 
without throwing them out completely. But I do want to emphasize that his 
pictures were quite good.
 
So, why did I bring him up? Because many of his pictures were also, *I felt*, 
somewhat static. Immediately identifiable as to subject matter, simple 
composition, inoffensive, technically good, but sort of static -- sort of safe. He 
was a stock photographer of many years -- about 25, I think.
 
This is the same reaction I had to many of the SOLD shots in this month's 
gallery. That they were often less dynamic -- more safe, more static -- than some 
of the other shots I have seen from these very same people (or other people) 
in other galleries -- either open or themed. 
 
Food for thought.

Marnie aka Doe ;-)

Reply via email to