thanks bill

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: ist 35mm


> The *ist would not be an upgrade.  The *istD would be.
>
> Bill
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "arnie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 3:02 PM
> Subject: Re: ist 35mm
>
>
> > Joe
> >
> > i own a zx-5n and i'm pretty happy with it. the mount doesn't affect me
> > because both my lenses are fa. The question i have is whether the ist
> would
> > be an upgrade, and whether its worth the money.
> >
> > arnie
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Joe Wilensky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:43 AM
> > Subject: Re: ist 35mm
> >
> >
> > > I think the question was about the *ist film camera. I haven't played
> > > with one, but I did recently pick up an MZ-5n (ZX-5n). The advantages
> > > to the MZ/ZX-5n would be its compatability with all K-mount (and
> > > screwmount) lenses and its classical interface, much like an
> > > autofocus combo between the MX and Super Program.
> > >
> > >  From what I've seen, the ZX-5n fetches quite a bit on the used
> > > market, as it is recognized as being the top-of-the-line ZX series
> > > camera with its spotmetering, bracketing, TTL flash, etc. I know the
> > > MZ-3 is even higher spec'd (and its prices reflect that), but it is
> > > rarely found in North America, it seems.
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > >
> > > >On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, arnie wrote:
> > > >>  I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the ist 35mm
> camera
> > and
> > > >>  how it stacks up vs. the zx-5n. some of the ist's features look
very
> > > >>  enticing - 11 point autofocus, advanced flash, 17 custom functions
> > > >
> > > >I own both, although I really haven't used the ZX-5n in about a year.
> > > >
> > > >The *ist D is a little bigger, better built, has faster autofocus,
and
> > > >a different UI.  The ZX-5n UI is really the classic SLR UI, you set
> > > >aperature on the lens and shutter speed with a dial on top of the
> > > >camera.  The *ist D UI is the modern SLR UI, you have two jog dials
on
> > > >the body, one of which sets aperature and one of which sets shutter
> > > >speed.  The ZX-5n UI is really nice if you love classic SLRs, but the
> > > >*ist D UI has the advantages of supporting hypermanual and
> > > >hyperprogram.  Those are two features that I never really thought
> > > >I'd care about until I owned a camera with them.  Now I pretty much
> > > >use either hypermanual or hyperprogram for every shot.
> > > >
> > > >I should probably sell my ZX-5n, but I'm afraid that they probably
> > > >don't fetch too much on the used market.  I also have an MX and think
> > > >I'd grab it if I was shooting film.
> > > >
> > > >alex
> > >
> > >
> > > -- 
> > >
> > > Joe Wilensky
> > > Staff Writer
> > > Communication and Marketing Services
> > > 1150 Comstock Hall
> > > Cornell University
> > > Ithaca, NY 14853-2601
> > >
> > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > tel: 607-255-1575
> > > fax: 607-255-9873
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>


Reply via email to