I assume Paal is no longer with us, as I didn't see his contributions
any more lately.

Frits

On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 21:43, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> >From: "Treena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> >Subject: Re: Has Pentax missed again?
> >
> >I just wonder how happy Rebel digital customers will be.
> 
> Happy enough.
> Remember clone computers from before 1990?
> Real junk.
> But people were willing to buy cheap knowing that the
> good stuff would continue to drop in price and that
> they could afford something nicer later.  But for now the
> cheap think would do.
> 
> Same here.
> This next year we'll see a shake-up.
> Prediction:
> There'll be a 6Mp Pentax for $300 and built like it. ZX-Md
> -- Manual focus.
> -- No preview screen or "extra" controls.
> -- Just shoot and transfer to your computer.
> -- Pentax users will snatch it up @ 1/5 the price of the istD.
> -- This will be the "new" student starter camera for schools.
> -- Soon followed by the $400 "advanced" ZX-5nd.
> 
> Yes, it'll be cheap.
> But it will do the job.
> Amateurs will be happy.
> PDML will be whining as always.
> Paal will be predicting a new flagship.
> But I digress ...
> 
> The good stuff @ $1500 will be sitting there while the new cheap
> trash sells faster than hotcakes.
> 
> Then the following year ...
> ... some new manufacturer with a creative marketing method and 
> lots of money will arise and take over the camera industry.  
> Sort of like Compaq.
> Canon & Nikon will become IBM & Apple
> (really good stuff but priced a for business, not the consumer) & 
> Pentax will continue to be a "Toshiba" (good stuff, small niche).
> This new Brand-X will be everywhere, even blister-packed @ Aldi.
> 
> We're going back to late-80s computer marketing -- Low margins,
> low quality, high volume -- at least for a year or two.
> 
> So what to do:  Get a good one now while you can.  Otherwise you'll
> have to wait 2 years until some good stuff is fiscally able to return
> to the retail shelves.
> 
> mnsho,
> 
> CRB
-- 
Frits W�thrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to