Alin,

To that end, it seems that the old Agfa Ultra 50 was not so much
different.  Quite punchy, but quite grainy for an ISO 50 film.  Also I
found it to be quite specialized - did not handle contrast very well.
 Seemed to me it was the film to use when the colors were dull and the
 lighting was flat.

 I have found that both Konica Impressa 50 and Fuji Reala 100 are much
 better general purpose films.  Ironically, both are lower contrast
 films - they end up being a good companion to the Agfa Ultra.  My old
 rule of thumb was shoot one of those unless the sitaution would end
 up with dull, colorless images - then switch to Agfa Ultra.

---
Bruce


Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 3:26:22 AM, you wrote:

AF> Alan wrote:

AC>> I don't think there is subsititute for RVP, negative or slide. Your best
AC>> hope would be Agfa Ultra 100.

AF>   Uh, I just got to see my first Ultra 100 test results and they are
AF>   not very encouraging to say the least.
  
AF>   I took pictures of a variety of subjects, including scenics, macro
AF>   with and without flash, portraits. Colours are very good in diffused
AF>   light, even with direct flash. The increased saturation is there but
AF>   it doesn't impact the colour balance, except for the skin tones that
AF>   get a red or magenta (for backlight with blue skies) taint.
  
AF>   The bad news are firstly grain - unacceptably high for a 100 ASA
AF>   negative, almost as high as a 400 ASA film. This is especially
AF>   annoying as in the product specification Ultra is given with very
AF>   low granularity. I have to take the next Ultras to an Agfa lab to
AF>   have it specifically developed in Agfa C41 chemicals and see if it
AF>   gets any better.
AF>   Second, the Agfa exhibits the same poor antihalation protection I
AF>   have noticed previously with the old Optima II 100. The edges of
AF>   overexposed areas are excessively blended with the adjacent areas,
AF>   resulting in a massive sharpness decrease. For instance in a sunset
AF>   shot this shows up as fuzzy horizon line and exaggerated
AF>   silhouettes effects.

AF>   Anyway I'm not going to dismiss Ultra 100 that fast and continue to
AF>   test with different subjects and labs. It is obviously a very
AF>   specialized film that works as intended only in specific situations
AF>   and I intend to determine exactly its usefulness.
 
AF>   Servus,  Alin



Reply via email to